22nd June 2026
In today’s uncertain market, many businesses are reconsidering deals which have become commercially unfavourable – perhaps due to supply chain disruption, the rising costs of materials, outdated appraisals and other factors. In this article, we highlight key commercial and legal issues when considering contract termination.
If your business is facing deals which have become commercially unfavourable in the current economic and geopolitical climate, you may be contemplating terminating contracts. If so, there are key commercial and legal issues and risks to take into account. In this article, we set out essential strategic considerations, and offer practical advice.
Assuming that grounds for termination have arisen (as to which, see below under ‘Legal considerations on terminating contracts), the following commercial and practical considerations arise:
This will depend on the particular business, the stage of any ongoing projects or commercial/supply chain arrangements, and other factors such as any third party commitments or deadlines which may be impacted from the contract termination.
Where a party is in breach of any contract term[s], it might be more commercially favourable for a business to sue for damages or, if the breach is a particularly serious one, to rescind (set aside) the contract and sue for financial compensation as well.
Depending on the circumstances, the contract itself may provide strategies which may offer flexibility and/or commercial assistance. These might include (non-exhaustively) price adjustment clauses, variation/no-oral modification clauses, and material adverse change clauses.
Alternatively, it might be more favourable for the business to explore suspension, re-negotiation or alternative dispute resolution [1].
Specialist strategic advice will enable businesses to settle upon the best course of action.
There are multiple considerations here:
Alongside commercial considerations, it’s essential to ensure a legal basis for termination.
The business should consider, and take specialist advice on, the specific contract and all relevant circumstances. It’s vital to ensure termination is executed validly, and to avoid or minimise the risk of consequential counterclaims from the terminated party.
In particular:
The legal and practical steps involved in terminating a contract will differ according to whether the terminating party is relying on: an express contractual termination provision or break option; a common law right to bring an implied contract to an end; a repudiatory breach by the counterparty; force majeure; or the doctrine of frustration [3].
This is critical. In some cases, it may be clear and uncontentious that a contractually-specified termination or force majeure event has occurred. In others, a higher degree of assessment and interpretation may be required – for example where a termination provision permits an element of subjectivity or discretion on the part of the terminating party, or where a breach has occurred but may be inconsequential or easily remedial.
Depending on the particular contract, a party may not have long to exercise a right of termination. Prevarication or delay may result in affirmation of the contract, and the right to terminate being lost [4].
In many cases, service of a termination notice will be required. The valid and effective service of legal notices is a potential minefield.
Any termination provision, and all related provisions and service of notice clauses within the contract, must be read in full and in conjunction with each other. Questions to consider (non-exhaustively) include:
Bearing in mind the extensive commercial and legal considerations, not to mention the traps for the unwary, urgent specialist legal advice should be sought immediately the prospect of contract termination is mooted.
Once a termination strategy has been settled upon, all business colleagues/teams/departments, who may deal with the counterparty in question, should be informed and advised as to the position.
Measures should be taken to deal with the commercial and legal effects of contract termination. For example, alternative arrangements should be put into place to minimise disruption to ongoing projects/operations. Arrangements should be made to ensure compliance with any provisions or obligations which survive termination (concerning confidential information, or the possession or use of the counterparty’s intellectual property, for example).
Specialist solicitors should then prepare and issue any necessary notices on the business’ behalf, to minimise any risk of invalid drafting or service.
Clear records and a paper trail should be kept, to evidence the fact and circumstances of any breach or other event giving rise to the right to terminate. Records and evidence of the financial and commercial effect of any breach or termination event should also be maintained, in case the contract termination is challenged and needs to be explained in any subsequent dispute or litigation.
Solicitors should handle all communications – internal and well as external – concerning the decision to terminate and the termination itself. This is in anticipation of a challenge to any aspect of the termination, and should help to preserve legal privilege in all relevant documents and communications.
Ensuring you’ve obtained the best possible guidance before deciding and proceeding to terminate any commercial contract will help ensure the best result for your business.
Our Commercial Dispute Resolution specialists are experienced and expert in navigating contractual termination queries and dealing with the drafting and serving of notices.
Similarly, if and when your business finds itself on the receiving end of any contract termination notice or action, we can critically assess validity. We can provide commercially-focused strategic advice to ensure minimal disruption and losses to your business.
So, if your business needs advice, assistance or training in relation to contract termination, or if you have any queries or concerns in connection to any commercial contracts more generally, please contact Kathryn Vickers or Nick Attwooll, who will be very happy to help.
[1] See our briefing on ensuring effective dispute resolution
[2] Even worse, affirmation often leads to the counterparty then alleging repudiatory (i.e. serious/devastating) breach of contract on the part of the business which sought to terminate. Repudiation can leave a business open to recission of the contract, plus a claim for damages relating to what the injured party would have made if the contract had remained in effect
[3] See our recent briefing on supply chain disruption, and force majeure and frustration
[4] An example of this occurred in the case of DD Classics Ltd v Chen [2022] EWHC 1404 (Comm)
[5] See Walker Morris’ briefing for advice as to the ‘who, when and how’ of service of legal notices (including termination notices)
[6] Since our earlier briefing, the courts have seen other examples of informal but binding contracts, on these occasions, with contracts formed via WhatsApp messages: DAZN Ltd v Coupang Corp [2025] EWCA Civ 1083; Jaevee Homes Ltd v Fincham [2025] EWHC 942 (TCC)