30th July 2025
“This new contract family is a welcome addition to the JCT suites and a step towards more collaborative, cost-conscious contracting. If you’re looking for more transparent pricing and alternatives to fixed-price models within the construction industry, this could be a good option. Now is the time for employers and contractors to get familiar with the payment mechanics of this new form, run the numbers, and assess whether this model fits their project strategy.“
The Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) released the Target Cost Contract 2024 on 25 June 2025. It is the final piece in the publication of the JCT 2024 Edition suites.
This new contract family introduces a fresh approach by the JCT to cost management and collaboration. It includes:
According to the JCT, the ethos of this form is risk sharing and both Employer and Contractor can benefit from their joint efforts in ensuring the project has a successful financial outcome.1
In this article, we’re exploring the features of the TCC 2024 and sharing our key takeaways.
The TCC 2024 largely follows and builds on the familiar JCT Design and Build Contract 2024 Edition (DB 2024), however its payment mechanism is notably different.
In summary:
We explore each of these key terms in more detail below.
Unlike traditional JCT contracts that use a fixed lump ‘Contract Sum’, the TCC 2024 introduces a Target Cost, which is set out in Article 2. This figure is established based on the Employer’s Requirements, the Contractor’s Proposals, and a detailed Target Cost Analysis.
The JCT recommends that the Target Cost Analysis is as detailed as possible, and that the Employer’s Requirements are prescriptive as to the format and level of detail required2.
The Target Cost Analysis should clearly break down how the Target Cost has been calculated. It also serves as a benchmark and is used in calculating the Adjusted Target Cost Value of Work Completed (see commentary on the “Difference Share” below).
The Allowable Cost is the costs incurred by the Contractor in carrying out its obligations under the TCC 2024 of the types specified in Schedule 2.
Schedule 2 splits these costs into seven categories:
The Allowable Cost is calculated in accordance with Schedule 2 and the Contract Particulars (clause 4.5) which sets outs any Part(s) where lump sums, all-in rates or prices have been agreed in lieu of using actual cost (for example hourly rates for staff).
Part 1 (General) of Schedule 2 outlines the general principles for calculating the Allowable Cost. It confirms that no cost may be included unless it can be reasonably substantiated by the Contractor’s accounts and records. To enable the Employer or the Employer’s Agent to verify or calculate the Allowable Cost, the Contractor must:
The remaining Parts of Schedule 2 detail what can and cannot be charged under each category. For example, under Part 2 (Sub-Contract Work), the Allowable Cost includes amounts due and payable to sub-contractors (appointed in accordance with clause 3.3 of the TCC 2024) but excludes any amounts payable to the sub-contractors arising from the Contractor’s own default, whether by act or omission.
The Contract Fee is specified at clause 4.6 of the Contract Particulars. It is either a fixed sum or a percentage of the Allowable Cost. It is intended to cover all other costs and expenses of the Contractor other than the Allowable Cost.
Where the Contract Fee is a fixed sum, it is adjusted in accordance the formula set out at Schedule 3 (unless otherwise stated in the Contract Particulars). This formula adjusts the Contract Fee where it is a fixed sum to reflect any difference between the original Target Cost and the Adjusted Target Cost.
Any sum payable to the Contractor in respect of the Difference Share is calculated and adjusted under clause 4.7.
The parties can decide whether the Difference Share does or does not apply to Interim Payments by selecting this at clause 4.7.1 of the Contract Particulars. Where clause 4.7.1 does not apply, the Difference Share shall only be calculated for the final payment3.
Clause 4.7.1.1 and 4.7.2.1 of the Contract Particulars sets out the ‘gain’ mechanism where the final amounts of the Allowable Cost and the Contract Fee is less than the final Adjusted Target Cost. Clause 4.7.1.2 and 4.7.2.2 of the Contract Particulars sets out the ‘pain’ mechanism where the final amounts of the Allowable Cost and the Contract Fee exceeds the final Adjusted Target Cost.
The pain/gain mechanism can be structured using either percentage difference bands or monetary difference bands. Given that the Target Cost is adjustable, parties may prefer percentage difference bands for greater flexibility.
1.Late to the party?
JCT is playing catch-up. NEC3 and NEC4 have long offered target cost options (e.g. the Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC) Option C (target contract with activity schedule) and Option D (target contract with bill of quantities)). With NEC well-established, it will be interesting to see if JCT’s new form of TCC 2024 will gain traction in the industry or if the ‘tried and tested’ NEC forms will be preferred.
2.Fixed price still favoured?
Many businesses and existing JCT users may stick with the simplicity of fixed price lump sum contracts, such as the popular JCT DB 2024 (with two stage tendering for larger/more complex projects becoming increasingly common). It remains to be seen whether the TCC 2024 and its collaborative approach will be embraced by the industry.
3.Management heavy
Target cost contracts demand rigorous administration and management. Not only must Contractors keep good/detailed records, but the Employer (or the Employer’s Agent) must effectively verify and calculate the Allowable Cost. This may include audits. Both parties therefore need to have the right resources and expertise to manage this effectively.
4.Incentives must be right
The success of the pain/gain mechanism hinges on careful calibration. The Target Cost and Difference Share need to be set at the right level:
These metrics are often subject to significant negotiation and it is helpful to workshop several example scenarios so that all parties are fully satisfied with the final position proposed.
5.Contractor risk exposure
Target cost contracts can be an attractive option when scope is uncertain and there are several risks that cannot be priced clearly. Contractors are more likely to be comfortable to take on such risks knowing that there can be recovery beyond the Target Cost. Employers can benefit from more transparent pricing and potential savings if a perceived risk does not materialise.
The TCC 2024 is a notable step by the JCT toward more collaborative, cost-conscious contracting. Its success, however, will depend on how well the industry adapts to its mechanisms and whether it can deliver real value over more familiar fixed-price models. Whilst it’s a welcome addition to the JCT suites, it may take time and practical experience for it to prove itself as a viable alternative to more established forms like NEC.
If you have any questions about the best contract for your project, contact our construction experts, Lucy Wild or Jules Harbage.